Claims

New York students showed positive achievement and growth results under the APPR evaluation system

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Positive student achievement and growth results for students in New York followed implementation of the APPR evaluation system. → NWEA Research 2016

Evidence

NWEA Research 2016

NWEA Research. (2016). Students improve even amid evaluation controversy. Phi Delta Kappan 98 (2), 58-65. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/students-improve-even-amid-evaluation-controversy/ doi:10.1177/0031721716671910

q2 · i? · associational · r?

The article reports positive student achievement and growth results for students in New York under the APPR system, stating these results "suggest that improvements to the teacher evaluation process" emphasizing strong procedures and data use "have promise for improving educator effectiveness." No effect sizes or test statistics are printed in the available text.

"Positive student achievement and growth results for students in New York suggest that improvements to the teacher evaluation process that emphasize the importance of strong evaluation procedures, the systematic collection of evidence of teacher performance, and the use of data to inform the process, have promise for improving educator effectiveness"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ny-positive-achievement-growth-under-appr
title New York students showed positive achievement and growth results under the APPR evaluation system
description New York students showed positive achievement and growth results under the APPR evaluation system
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
recheck_by 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nwea-research-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.