Claims

Comparative studies found mixed results when comparing online active learning with in-person active learning.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Four studies compared learning satisfaction between online and in-person active learning, of which two found OAL inferior, one reported it as superior, and one found no differences. → Apel Z 2025

Evidence

Apel Z 2025

Apel Z, Sharmin N, Stefani CM, de Lima AA, Hussain A, Tjosvold L, Perez A. (2025). Online active learning in undergraduate dental education: A scoping review. Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13721

q3 · i? · review · r2

The review reports that "two found OAL inferior, one reported it as superior, and one found no differences" when comparing satisfaction between online and in-person active learning, indicating mixed findings.

"Interestingly, four studies compared learning satisfaction between online and in‐person active learning, of which two found OAL inferior, 17 , 18 one reported it as superior, 31 and one found no differences."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.