Test results confirmed the improvement of knowledge through online active learning.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? All four non-comparative studies assessing the impact of OAL on knowledge acquisition reported improvements in this outcome. → Apel Z 2025
Evidence¶
Apel Z 2025¶
Apel Z, Sharmin N, Stefani CM, de Lima AA, Hussain A, Tjosvold L, Perez A. (2025). Online active learning in undergraduate dental education: A scoping review. Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13721
q3 · i? · review · r2
The review states that "All four non‐comparative studies assessing the impact of OAL on knowledge acquisition reported improvements in this outcome," supporting the conclusion that test results confirmed knowledge improvement.
"All four non‐comparative studies assessing the impact of OAL on knowledge acquisition reported improvements in this outcome."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Comparative studies found mixed results when comparing online active learning with in-person active learning. — related
- Thirty-five studies on online active learning in undergraduate dental education were included in this scoping review. — related
- Four reviewed studies examined student-related impacts of LA-supported IBL on learning perception, activity engagement, content knowledge acquisition, and productive discourse — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.