Suppression of the Pre response pattern between Pre and During phases positively predicts Post phase win rates when learning a new pattern, mainly after wins¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 In Experiment 1, Pre-During OBR suppression correlated positively with Post win rate in the learning new condition after wins (r = .359) but not after losses. → Zhang 2026
q3 i2 In Experiment 2 (25%), suppression correlated positively with learning-new Post win rates after both wins and losses. → Zhang 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Zhang 2026¶
Zhang, Y., & Dyson, B. J. (2026). Recover or discover: How outcome feedback shapes response patterns within game spaces. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00414-w
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Individual-difference correlational analysis in Experiment 1 (n = 76): Pre-During OBR suppression predicted learning-new Post win rate after wins, "r = .359, p < .001"; the after-loss correlation was not significant.
"OBR suppression between Pre - During was positively correlated with Post phase win rates in the learning new condition following wins (r = .359, p < .001) but not following losses (r = .219, p = .058)."
Zhang 2026 (2)¶
Zhang, Y., & Dyson, B. J. (2026). Recover or discover: How outcome feedback shapes response patterns within game spaces. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00414-w
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Experiment 2 (25% condition, n = 72 analysed): suppression correlated with learning-new Post win rates after wins (r = .312) and losses (r = .239), both significant as printed.
"OBR suppression between Pre - During was positively correlated with Post phase win rates in the learning new condition following wins (r = .312, p = .008) and losses (r = .239, p = .043)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fixing the win rate in the During phase reduces optimal behaviour rates, indicating suppression of the previously learned pattern — related
- Suppression of the old pattern predicts relearning-old success positively under punishment but negatively under reinforcement — related
- Optimal behaviour is more frequent after wins than after losses, but the after-win advantage is absent in the Post phase and under high reinforcement — related
- High reinforcement (75%, 88% fixed win rate) maintains a relearning-old advantage in Post phase win rates and OBR — related
- Relearning an old response pattern generally beats learning a new one in the Post phase, except under severe 25% punishment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
obr-suppression-predicts-learning-new |
title |
Suppression of the Pre response pattern between Pre and During phases positively predicts Post phase win rates when learning a new pattern, mainly after wins |
description |
Suppression of the Pre response pattern between Pre and During phases positively predicts Post phase win rates when learning a new pattern, mainly after wins |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — zhang-2026, zhang-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.