Claims

Synchronous online forum discussion produces no statistically significant difference in lexical diversity compared with asynchronous blog writing in EFL post-test writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test lexical diversity did not differ significantly between the OFD group (M = 4.17, SD = 0.62) and the blog group (M = 4.26, SD = 0.63). → Jayaron Jose & Mohammed Jafre Zainol Abidin 2016

Evidence

Jayaron Jose & Mohammed Jafre Zainol Abidin 2016

Jayaron Jose & Mohammed Jafre Zainol Abidin. (2016). A Pedagogical Perspective on Promoting English as a Foreign Language Writing through Online Forum Discussions. English Language Teaching, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p84

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental between-groups post-test comparison of 28 OFD and 28 blog participants; the article reports "no significant difference between both the groups t (54) = -0.53, p = 0.59". No effect size is printed.

"The t test analysis (Table 3) has found that there is no significant difference between both the groups t (54) = -0.53, p = 0.59 (p > .05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.