Claims

Only 2 of the 20 included studies adopted an online approach to teach EBP, and both concluded that technology to teach research skills can facilitate EBP teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The use of online material and tools to teach EBP is in its infancy as only 2 studies adopted an online approach, concluding that the use of technology to teach research skills can facilitate EBP teaching. → Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Evidence

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos 2016

Kyriakoulis Konstantinos, Patelarou Athina, Laliotis Aggelos, Wan Andrew C, Matalliotakis Michail, Tsiou Chrysoula, Patelarou Evridiki. (2016). Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066070/

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of the review's search results. The review states online EBP teaching "is in its infancy as only 2 studies adopted an online approach to teach EBP" and that these concluded technology "can facilitate EBP teaching".

"Our review showed that the use of online material and tools to teaching EBP is in its infancy as only 2 studies adopted an online approach to teach EBP and concluded that the use of technology to teach research skills can facilitate EBP teaching [6,12]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.