Rural schools were far more likely than nonrural schools to offer Project On-Track tutoring during school only¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Ninety-two percent of rural schools offered tutoring during school only, compared with 47 percent of nonrural schools. → Pilchen 2024
Evidence¶
Pilchen 2024¶
Pilchen, A., Klute, M., Mielicki, M., & Kumbroch, H. (2024). Examining implementation and outcomes of the Project On-Track high-dosage literacy tutoring program (REL 2024-005). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/report/descriptive-study/examining-implementation-and-outcomes-project-track-high-dosage-tutoring-program
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Descriptive analysis of program records for 56 school-based tutoring sites (32 rural, 24 nonrural) on timing of tutoring in 2022/23. Interviewees attributed the rural preference to transportation barriers and difficulty reaching students after school.
"Ninety-two percent of rural schools offered tutoring during school only, compared with 47 percent of nonrural schools."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Sites offering tutoring during school were much more likely than out-of-school-hours sites to offer tutoring more than twice a week — related
- Rural SIG schools were more likely than nonrural SIG schools to adopt the transformation model (95 versus 74 percent) — related
- Administrators in eight of nine rural SIG schools reported rural-setting factors, chiefly long teacher commutes (six schools) or isolated communities (four), that hampered teacher recruitment or retention — related
- Rural SIG schools reported additional challenges from remote locations and large catchment areas beyond those reported by nonrural SIG schools — related
- Rural schools report school nurse shortages at more than twice the urban rate — related
- Tennessee's education department notes tutoring during the school day is more effective than before- or after-school programming — related
- Respondents in two of nine rural SIG schools saw transportation costs and catchment size as making it best to increase learning time within the existing schedule rather than extend the school day — related
- Timing of tutoring was significantly associated with tutor qualifications and with student grade level and baseline risk — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ontrack-rural-schools-during-school-tutoring |
title |
Rural schools were far more likely than nonrural schools to offer Project On-Track tutoring during school only |
description |
Rural schools were far more likely than nonrural schools to offer Project On-Track tutoring during school only |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pilchen-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.