Timing of tutoring was significantly associated with tutor qualifications and with student grade level and baseline risk¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? During-school-only schools were less likely to employ only teachers, administrators, or paraprofessionals as tutors, and served younger and lower-scoring students. → Pilchen 2024
Evidence¶
Pilchen 2024¶
Pilchen, A., Klute, M., Mielicki, M., & Kumbroch, H. (2024). Examining implementation and outcomes of the Project On-Track high-dosage literacy tutoring program (REL 2024-005). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/report/descriptive-study/examining-implementation-and-outcomes-project-track-high-dosage-tutoring-program
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Chi-square tests across 56 sites also found significant timing-by-grade (χ2(2) = 52.10, p < .01) and timing-by-baseline-DIBELS (χ2(2) = 27.26, p < .01) associations: over 80 percent of grade 1–2 students and 84 percent of at-risk students received during-school tutoring versus 68 percent of grade 3 students.
"Chi-square tests of independence conducted to examine associations between pairs of tutoring implementation features found a significant association between the timing of tutoring and tutor qualifications ( χ2(2) = 6.20, p = .04)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Slightly fewer than half (42 percent) of students who started the year in the at risk DIBELS category moved to a lower risk category after a full year of Project On-Track tutoring — related
- Among students who started the year most at risk for reading difficulties, none of the three implementation features (timing, frequency, tutor qualifications) was associated with end-of-year literacy progress — related
- Schools using only teachers, administrators, or paraprofessionals as tutors were more likely to serve students with higher baseline DIBELS scores — related
- Sites offering tutoring during school were much more likely than out-of-school-hours sites to offer tutoring more than twice a week — related
- Rural schools were far more likely than nonrural schools to offer Project On-Track tutoring during school only — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ontrack-timing-associations-qualifications-grade-risk |
title |
Timing of tutoring was significantly associated with tutor qualifications and with student grade level and baseline risk |
description |
Timing of tutoring was significantly associated with tutor qualifications and with student grade level and baseline risk |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pilchen-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.