Claims

OnYourMark tutoring did not produce significantly better performance on the NWEA MAP

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The DIBELS gains did not translate to significantly better performance on the NWEA MAP (effect size = +0.04). → OnYourMark 2023

Evidence

OnYourMark 2023

OnYourMark. (2023). OnYourMark program description and evaluation summary. https://www.onyourmark.education

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Second outcome measure from the same randomized study of 2,085 K-2 students. The article reports results "did not translate to significantly better performance on the NWEA MAP (effect size = +0.04)"; equivalence was not tested.

"Results did not translate to significantly better performance on the NWEA MAP (effect size = +0.04)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id onyourmark-no-significant-nwea-map-effect
title OnYourMark tutoring did not produce significantly better performance on the NWEA MAP
description OnYourMark tutoring did not produce significantly better performance on the NWEA MAP
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — onyourmark-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.