Open inquiry implementation faces challenges requiring classroom management, flexible teaching, teacher-student interaction and teacher support¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Successful implementation of open inquiry is facilitated by teachers who can effectively manage and regulate the learning environment. → Muhamad Dah 2024
q2 i? Open inquiry as direct application of high student-centered learning was particularly challenging for students with lower abilities, requiring adaptation and modification. → Muhamad Dah 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
Muhamad Dah 2024¶
Muhamad Dah, N., Mat Noor, M. S. A., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Syed Abdul Azziz, S. S. (2024). The impacts of open inquiry on students' learning in science: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601
q2 · i? · review · r2
In its discussion, the review states implementation "may be facilitated by teachers who can effectively manage and regulate the learning environment", noting students often work in small groups and teachers frequently rely on high-achieving students.
"Successful implementation of open inquiry may be facilitated by teachers who can effectively manage and regulate the learning environment (Kang, 2022; Mentzer et al., 2019), especially considering that students often conduct experiments or projects in small groups"
Muhamad Dah 2024 (2)¶
Muhamad Dah, N., Mat Noor, M. S. A., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Syed Abdul Azziz, S. S. (2024). The impacts of open inquiry on students' learning in science: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, citing Rahmat and Chanunan (2018), that open inquiry was "particularly challenging for students with lower abilities"; suggested supports include providing general procedures initially or letting students watch examples first.
"implementing open inquiry as a direct application of student-centered learning proved to be particularly challenging for students with lower abilities (Rahmat & Chanunan, 2018). Therefore, for low-ability students, open inquiry was not an ideal method for directly applying high student-centered learning"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The highest level of inquiry may not be the 'best' approach for science learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- VR/AR implementation challenges fall on three fronts: learner distraction and discomfort, teacher classroom-management and design burdens, and school cost and infrastructure limits — related
- Antecedent-focused emotion regulation strategies are linked to higher-quality teacher-student interactions and better classroom management — related
- Teachers' limited skills in facilitating conversations and managing classrooms was the second most salient implementation barrier — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
open-inquiry-implementation-challenges |
title |
Open inquiry implementation faces challenges requiring classroom management, flexible teaching, teacher-student interaction and teacher support |
description |
Open inquiry implementation faces challenges requiring classroom management, flexible teaching, teacher-student interaction and teacher support |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — muhamad-dah-2024, muhamad-dah-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.