Claims

Percentile-based and percentage-of-failure evaluations of stimulus-word difficulty agree almost perfectly (rank r = .996)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 1918 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 Ranking the 80 stimulus words by percentage of failure versus by percentile values derived from the probability curve yields a rank correlation of r = .996. → Harry A. Greene 1918

Evidence

Harry A. Greene 1918

Harry A. Greene. (1918). A Standardization of Certain Opposites Tests. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070589

q2 · i3 · associational · r1

A method-comparison analysis in this standardization study, in which both evaluation procedures were carried through for comparison. The article reports the printed effect size r = .996 as "almost perfect, "r" being equal to .996".

"The actual rank correlation between the results of the methods was almost perfect, "r" being equal to .996."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id opposites-word-difficulty-methods-rank-r-996
title Percentile-based and percentage-of-failure evaluations of stimulus-word difficulty agree almost perfectly (rank r = .996)
description Percentile-based and percentage-of-failure evaluations of stimulus-word difficulty agree almost perfectly (rank r = .996)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1918
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — harry-a-greene-1918

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.