Claims

Retrieval practice research extends to determining the optimal amount of practice testing for individual students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Rawson and Dunlosky consider the optimal amount of practice testing for individual students. → Pooja K. Agarwal 2012

Evidence

Pooja K. Agarwal 2012

Pooja K. Agarwal. (2012). Advances in Cognitive Psychology Relevant to Education: Introduction to the Special Issue. Educational Psychol Rev (2012) 24:353–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9212-0

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The introduction previews Rawson and Dunlosky's article, which extends retrieval practice research to "the optimal amount of practice testing for individual students." No specific optimum is stated in this commentary.

"Next, Katherine Rawson and John Dunlosky further consider retrieval practice, including the optimal amount of practice testing for individual students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id optimal-amount-of-practice-testing-individual-students
title Retrieval practice research extends to determining the optimal amount of practice testing for individual students
description Retrieval practice research extends to determining the optimal amount of practice testing for individual students
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2012
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pooja-k-agarwal-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.