Relearning-to-criterion designs confound distribution of practice with amount of second-session practice¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2006 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? In studies training to criterion in later sessions, longer ISIs necessarily provide more relearning trials, making it impossible to isolate distributed practice effects per se. → Cepeda 2006
Evidence¶
Cepeda 2006¶
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks: A Review and Quantitative Synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
q1 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Methodological argument, not a tested result: the authors identify criterion-training procedures (e.g., Bahrick's studies) as confounding ISI with relearning amount and recommend fixed relearning trials to equalize initial learning.
"Thus, in designs that have this feature, distribution of practice is confounded with the amount of practice time during the second (and subsequent) sessions. This makes it impossible to know whether differences in final-test performance reflect distributed practice effects per se"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Spaced Practice Improves Retention — related
- The optimal interstudy interval increases as the retention interval increases — related
- ISI effects on recall are nonmonotonic and depend jointly on retention interval — related
- Spaced retrieval practice produces better final retention than massed retrieval even though spacing lowers initial retrieval success, and more absolute spacing enhances long-term retention — related
- Spaced retrieval practice (successive relearning) produced multi-year retention of foreign language vocabulary in adults, as reported by the review — related
- Distributed practice outperforms massed practice for long-term learning, with a possible foreign-language exception — related
- Proportional measurement of relearning intervals poses a scaling problem for mapping optimal relearning schedules — related
- Retrieval practice research extends to determining the optimal amount of practice testing for individual students — related
- For short maze problems, massed learning effort is more economical than distributed effort in trials, time and errors, for both rats and human adults — related
- First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions — related
- Total exposure time per session was significantly lower in the relearn condition than in the restudy condition, ruling out an exposure confound — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
relearning-confound-distributed-practice-designs |
title |
Relearning-to-criterion designs confound distribution of practice with amount of second-session practice |
description |
Relearning-to-criterion designs confound distribution of practice with amount of second-session practice |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
source_checked |
2026-10-21 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — cepeda-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.