Claims

The oracy curriculum and resources require refinement to strengthen exploratory talk and diverse formal and informal oracy opportunities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Further refinement of the curriculum and associated resources is required to highlight the role, nature and development of exploratory talk and to ensure diverse formal and non-formal oracy opportunities. → Maxwell 2015

Evidence

Maxwell 2015

Maxwell, B., Burnett, C., Reidy, J., Willis, B., & Demack, S. (2015). Oracy Curriculum, Culture and Assessment Toolkit: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581146

q2 · i? · design · r2

Evaluators' conclusion from qualitative review of the dedicated Year 7 curriculum, oracy in every lesson approaches, and whole school culture during the 2013-14 pilot. Earlier findings state "a strengthening of the cognitive strand, including provision for exploratory talk, is required" in the curriculum.

"Further refinement of the curriculum and associated resources is required to highlight the role, nature and development of exploratory talk and to ensure diverse opportunities for oracy, formal and non-formal, are provided."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.