Claims

Committing to oracy in every lesson gave staff and students a shared language for oracy and familiarity with talk-organising approaches

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The commitment to promote oracy across the curriculum ensured School 21 staff and students possess and utilise a shared language for oracy and are familiar with approaches for organising, promoting and reviewing talk. → Maxwell 2015

Evidence

Maxwell 2015

Maxwell, B., Burnett, C., Reidy, J., Willis, B., & Demack, S. (2015). Oracy Curriculum, Culture and Assessment Toolkit: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581146

q2 · i? · design · r3

Qualitative thematic analysis of observations, interviews and focus groups from three field visits during the 2013-14 pilot. The report concludes students had opportunities to use talk in diverse motivating contexts for different purposes, while further consideration of how to engage students in exploratory talk across the curriculum is required.

"The commitment to promote oracy across the curriculum, and in every lesson, has ensured that School 21 staff and students possess and utilise a shared language for oracy and are familiar with a range of approaches for organising, promoting and reviewing talk."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.