Claims

The oracy intervention showed no impact on Year 7 students' non-verbal reasoning skills as measured by the Raven's Progressive Matrices test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre and post Raven's Progressive Matrices testing showed no impact of the intervention on students' non-verbal reasoning skills. → Maxwell 2015

Evidence

Maxwell 2015

Maxwell, B., Burnett, C., Reidy, J., Willis, B., & Demack, S. (2015). Oracy Curriculum, Culture and Assessment Toolkit: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581146

q2 · i? · design · r2

Indicative quantitative impact measure comparing pre and post Raven's Progressive Matrices results for 20 School 21 Year 7 students with 18 students from a comparison school. The report states the tests "showed no impact of the intervention on student's non- verbal reasoning skills"; no effect size is printed for this comparison.

"Findings from the pre and post Ravens Progressive Matrices tests, administered by the evaluators, showed no impact of the intervention on student's non- verbal reasoning skills."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.