Claims

The prototype Oracy Assessment Toolkit gave a tentative indication that the intervention positively impacted students' oracy skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? University of Cambridge testing with the prototype Oracy Assessment Toolkit provided a tentative indication of a positive impact on students' oracy skills. → Maxwell 2015

Evidence

Maxwell 2015

Maxwell, B., Burnett, C., Reidy, J., Willis, B., & Demack, S. (2015). Oracy Curriculum, Culture and Assessment Toolkit: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581146

q2 · i? · design · r3

The University of Cambridge used its pilot Oracy Assessment Toolkit with 12 School 21 Year 7 students and 12 comparison-school students on a pre and post basis spanning five months, comparing mean task ratings. The report calls this only "a tentative indication" of positive impact; no effect size is printed.

"However, tests undertaken by the University of Cambridge using the prototype Oracy Assessment Toolkit developed for this project provided a tentative indication that the intervention had a positive impact on students' oracy skills."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.