Claims

Oral exam scores correlate only modestly with written exams and OSCEs (r = 0.10–0.74), suggesting oral exams assess distinct skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Correlations between oral scores and written exams or OSCEs were modest (r = 0.10–0.74), which the review interprets as oral exams assessing distinct skills such as clinical reasoning and communication. → Torab-Miandoab A 2026

Evidence

Torab-Miandoab A 2026

Torab-Miandoab A, Ghafourifard M, Habibi-Chenaran S, Ghaffarifar S. (2026). Structured approaches to improving outcomes of oral exam in medical and paramedical education: A systematic review and evidence-based framework. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355461

q2 · i1 · review · r2

Review synthesis of validity evidence across included studies. The review reports correlations that were "modest (r = 0.10–0.74)" with written exams and OSCEs, and criterion validity associations with postgraduate performance (r = 0.37–0.45 with prior certification scores), while some studies reported no significant correlation with board certification pass rates.

"Correlations between oral scores and written exams or OSCEs were modest (r = 0.10–0.74), indicating oral exams assess distinct skills like clinical reasoning and communication."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.