Oral exam scores correlate only modestly with written exams and OSCEs (r = 0.10–0.74), suggesting oral exams assess distinct skills¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 Correlations between oral scores and written exams or OSCEs were modest (r = 0.10–0.74), which the review interprets as oral exams assessing distinct skills such as clinical reasoning and communication. → Torab-Miandoab A 2026
Evidence¶
Torab-Miandoab A 2026¶
Torab-Miandoab A, Ghafourifard M, Habibi-Chenaran S, Ghaffarifar S. (2026). Structured approaches to improving outcomes of oral exam in medical and paramedical education: A systematic review and evidence-based framework. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355461
q2 · i1 · review · r2
Review synthesis of validity evidence across included studies. The review reports correlations that were "modest (r = 0.10–0.74)" with written exams and OSCEs, and criterion validity associations with postgraduate performance (r = 0.37–0.45 with prior certification scores), while some studies reported no significant correlation with board certification pass rates.
"Correlations between oral scores and written exams or OSCEs were modest (r = 0.10–0.74), indicating oral exams assess distinct skills like clinical reasoning and communication."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student performance on design problems correlates negligibly with traditional project grades, suggesting DPs capture distinct transfer-oriented HOT dimensions — related
- Knowledge-level assessments (written and oral exams) are underrepresented in the physical therapy assessment literature relative to performance-based assessments — related
- Written knowledge tests, OSCEs and situational judgement tests all show predictive validity for later clinical performance — related
- OSCE validity correlations with other measures range from very weak to strong, suggesting OSCEs resemble narrow course examinations more than broad clinical practice — related
- Structured viva shows positive significant correlations with standard assessment tools (MCQs, OSCE, structured theory exam) while traditional viva does not correlate significantly with the structured theory exam — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.