Students' main difficulties during OrCheTaboo were associating concepts and giving scientific descriptions, with lack of knowledge and forbidden terms also cited¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Most reported difficulties were difficulty in association between the concepts (24.2%) and scientific description (22.6%), followed by lack of time (19.4%), lack of knowledge (17.7%), and the forbidden terms (16.1%). → Akkuzu 2016

Evidence¶

Akkuzu 2016¶

Akkuzu, N. & Uyulgan, M.A. (2016). How to Improve Students' Comprehension concerning the Major Terms of Functional Groups?--In the Experiment of OrCheTaboo Game. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p196

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Content analysis of the interview question about difficulties while describing terms (Table 8). The article attributes these difficulties to students not comprehending molecular structures, inability to classify similar and different characteristics, and lack of knowledge about functional groups.

"When we analyzed the answers to this question, most of the answers are about the difficulty in association between the concepts (24.2%) and scientific description (22.6%)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• 53% of experimental students considered themselves sufficient at describing terms, most often citing ability of expressing — related
• Students most often attributed OrCheTaboo's contribution to retention in learning, followed by fun learning, association between concepts, and increased motivation — related
• 91% of experimental group students said OrCheTaboo helped them learn functional-group concepts — related