Claims

Origami and conventional instruction groups showed no preexisting differences on spatial orientation, spatial visualization, or geometric knowledge before treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? MANOVA and univariate ANOVAs on pretest scores showed no preexisting differences between the experimental and control groups on any dependent measure. → Akayuure et al. 2016

Evidence

Akayuure et al. 2016

Peter Akayuure, S. K. Asiedu-Addo, Victor Alebna. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Origami Instruction on Preservice Teachers’ Spatial Ability and Geometric Knowledge for Teaching. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.78424

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pretest comparison in the quasi-experiment (experimental n = 52, control n = 42): the MANOVA on pretest scores and univariate ANOVAs on spatial orientation, spatial visualization, and GKT all showed no preexisting group differences, supporting attribution of posttest differences to treatment.

"Furthermore, the univariate ANOVA results on pretest scores showed no preexisting differences between the two groups in terms of the subscales of spatial orientation, spatial visualization and geometric knowledge."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.