Claims

Origami instruction yields statistically significant posttest differences in spatial orientation relative to conventional instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Univariate ANOVA showed statistically significant differences in posttest spatial orientation mean scores between the origami and conventional groups. → Akayuure et al. 2016

Evidence

Akayuure et al. 2016

Peter Akayuure, S. K. Asiedu-Addo, Victor Alebna. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Origami Instruction on Preservice Teachers’ Spatial Ability and Geometric Knowledge for Teaching. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.78424

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Univariate ANOVA on posttest scores of the quasi-experiment (experimental n = 52, control n = 42). Descriptive means favored the experimental group on spatial orientation (7.73 vs 6.43 on a 10-point max). The article reports "statistical significan t differences in posttest mean scores between groups in spatial orientation"; no effect size value is printed for this univariate contrast.

"However, there were statistical significan t differences in posttest mean scores between groups in spatial orientation and GKT ."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.