Claims

OSCE designs with 5-10 stations achieve good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83), outperforming designs with fewer than 5 or more than 10 stations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Meta-analysis of 23 studies shows OSCEs with 5-10 stations achieve good internal consistency (alpha = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81-0.84), significantly better than fewer than 5 stations (alpha = 0.75) or more than 10 stations (alpha = 0.77). → Peng Qiyun 2025

Evidence

Peng Qiyun 2025

Peng Qiyun, Luo Jiani, Wang Chunyan, Chen Lei, Tan Shenglan. (2025). Impact of station number and duration time per station on the reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06691-0

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Random-effects meta-analysis of 23 studies (26 alpha values) categorized by station number (<5, 5-10, >10). The 5-10 station group achieved the highest pooled alpha of 0.83, meeting the threshold for good internal consistency, while both smaller and larger station counts fell below it.

"good internal consistency was achieved when the station number was between 5 and 10 (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.84). However, internal consistency was poorer when the station number was less than 5 (Cronbach's alpha = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.78) or more than 10 stations (Cronbach's alpha = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.75-0.80)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.