Claims

When OSCEs have 5-10 stations, duration per station under 10 minutes yields significantly better internal consistency (alpha = 0.88) than 10 or more minutes (alpha = 0.64)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Within the 5-10 station subgroup, OSCEs with station durations under 10 minutes achieved higher internal consistency (alpha = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00) than those with durations of 10 or more minutes (alpha = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.59-0.69). → Peng Qiyun 2025

Evidence

Peng Qiyun 2025

Peng Qiyun, Luo Jiani, Wang Chunyan, Chen Lei, Tan Shenglan. (2025). Impact of station number and duration time per station on the reliability of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06691-0

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup meta-analysis restricted to studies with 5-10 stations, comparing duration <10 min versus >=10 min. The under-10-minute group reached the highest pooled alpha (0.88) in the review, attributed by the authors to reduced examiner and participant fatigue.

"when the station number were set to 5-10, internal consistency was significantly better with duration time under 10 min (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.00) compared to durations exceeding 10 min per station (Cronbach's alpha = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.69)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.