Claims

Effects on the ATOP scale were inconsistent across the three studies that used it

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of three studies using the Attitudes Toward Obese Persons scale, one reported significant improvement, one reported no significant change, and one reported significant improvement in the experimental group versus controls across pretest, posttest, and follow-up. → Steinacker Anna C. 2026

Evidence

Steinacker Anna C. 2026

Steinacker Anna C., Bischof Lukas, Herchet Daniela, Kreiss Victoria, Klingenberg Michael, Bösner Stefan. (2026). Obesity simulation suits in health professions education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09565-1

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's synthesis of questionnaire outcomes across included studies reports divergent ATOP results: "One study reported a significant improvement in ATOP scores from pre- to post-intervention" while a second reported no significant change; a third found significant improvement in the experimental group versus controls.

"The Attitudes Toward Obese Persons (ATOP) scale was used in three studies [25, 30, 32]. One study reported a significant improvement in ATOP scores from pre- to post-intervention [30]. A second reported no significant change following the intervention [32]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.