Claims

Evidence on obesity simulation suits in healthcare education is limited and heterogeneous, with mixed effects on attitudes and empathy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, spanning multiple countries and health disciplines, and reported mixed results with some short-term improvements and others finding no significant changes. → Steinacker Anna C. 2026

Evidence

Steinacker Anna C. 2026

Steinacker Anna C., Bischof Lukas, Herchet Daniela, Kreiss Victoria, Klingenberg Michael, Bösner Stefan. (2026). Obesity simulation suits in health professions education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09565-1

q2 · i? · review · r3

Scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework refined by JBI, searching CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in November 2025 with citation tracking. "Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria out of 152 identified records." Results were synthesized descriptively with no formal critical appraisal.

"Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria out of 152 identified records. Studies were conducted across multiple countries, including the United States, Germany, and other countries, and involved learners from medicine, nursing, nutrition science, and exercise science."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.