Claims

Teachers and pupils reported that P4C benefited wider outcomes such as confidence to speak, listening, and self-esteem

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers and pupils generally reported a belief that P4C had a beneficial impact on pupils' confidence to speak, patience when listening to others, and self-esteem. → Gorard et al. 2015

Evidence

Gorard et al. 2015

Stephen Gorard, Nadia Siddiqui and Beng Huat See. (2015). Philosophy for Children: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581147

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Process-evaluation evidence from informal interviews during 30 evaluator visits to treatment schools and observations of eight P4C sessions; these are perceptions, not tested outcomes. Some teachers also perceived positive impacts on classroom engagement and pupils asking more questions across all lessons.

"Feedback from teachers and pupils also suggested a belief that P4C had a beneficial impact on wider outcomes such as pupils' confidence to speak, patience when listening to others, and self-esteem."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.