Teachers reported increased confidence reading aloud and willingness to choose more difficult books as proxy indicators of improved reading¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Teachers used proxy indicators — increased confidence in reading aloud, wider vocabulary and willingness to choose more difficult books — to evidence perceptions of improved reading ability. → Cockerill et al. 2018
q2 i? 62% of teachers reported moderate to high impact on students' reading attainment in the online survey. → Cockerill et al. 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Cockerill et al. 2018¶
Maria Cockerill, Nicole Craig, Allen Thurston. (2018). TEACHER PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPACT OF PEER LEARNING IN THEIR CLASSROOMS: USING SOCIAL INTERDEPENDENCE THEORY AS A MODEL FOR DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1): 14-27. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.14.27
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Qualitative survey and case study data on reading behaviours. Teachers reported obvious gains in confidence with reading aloud over the weeks and that students opted for more challenging books as the course continued.
"Although teachers were generally hesitant to comment on students‟ reading attainment qualitatively they used proxy indicators to evidence their perceptions of improved reading ability based on the changes they saw in reading behaviours between students. These reading behaviours were an increased confidence in reading aloud, wider vocabulary and a willingness to choose more difficult books to read."
Cockerill et al. 2018 (2)¶
Maria Cockerill, Nicole Craig, Allen Thurston. (2018). TEACHER PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPACT OF PEER LEARNING IN THEIR CLASSROOMS: USING SOCIAL INTERDEPENDENCE THEORY AS A MODEL FOR DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1): 14-27. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.14.27
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Quantitative item from the online survey of 61 teachers using a six-point impact scale. 62% reported moderate to high impact on reading attainment; teachers often did not feel qualified to comment without test results.
"Nevertheless, in the online survey 62% of teachers reported moderate to high impact on students‟ reading attainment when asked to quantify their views."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Self-Efficacy — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Teachers and pupils reported that P4C benefited wider outcomes such as confidence to speak, listening, and self-esteem — a broader claim this one bears on
- TAs and coordinators reported improved pupil confidence, engagement and willingness to attempt numeracy problems during the intervention — a broader claim this one bears on
- Peer tutoring in clinical simulation is associated with gains in non-technical skills including self-efficacy, self-confidence, self-perception of learning, and reflective abilities — a broader claim this one bears on
- TDTS teachers reported more positive views of pupils' ability and engagement, and judged the approach beneficial across the ability range including pupils with special educational needs — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students' journal entries and observed behaviour suggested increased writing self-confidence and interest — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.