Charter elementary schools show stronger reading growth while multi-level charter schools show significantly weaker growth in both subjects¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students in charter elementary schools gain about 41 more days of learning in reading and perform similarly in math; middle and high school charters perform similarly to VCR peers; multi-level charter students experience about 41 fewer days in reading and 59 fewer in math. → Center for Research on Education Outcomes 2019
Evidence¶
Center for Research on Education Outcomes 2019¶
Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2019). Charter School Performance in Pennsylvania. Stanford University. https://credo.stanford.edu/reports/item/charter-school-performance-in-pennsylvania-2/
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Figure 7 analysis of learning gains by school grade configuration (elementary, middle, high, multi-level) against TPS VCR peers. Elementary charters show about 41 more days of reading learning; multi-level charters show significantly weaker growth in both subjects (about 41 fewer reading days, 59 fewer math days). No standardized effect size is printed.
"students in charter elementary schools experience greater growth than their TPS peers in reading, while performing similarly to their TPS peers in math. These students attending elementary charter schools experience about the equivalent of 41 more days of learning in reading"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Charter sector improvement stems mainly from existing schools improving, and gains appear at elementary, middle, and high school levels but not multi-level schools — related
- Middle-grade Idaho charter schools show the weakest growth while multi-level charters show the strongest reading growth — reports the opposite
- About 41 percent of Idaho charter schools significantly outperform their traditional schooling alternatives in both reading and math — related
- New Mexico charter elementary and middle school students show reading surpluses over TPS virtual twins, while high and multi-level charter students grow similarly — related
- Charter middle school students gain in math while multi-level charter students lag in both subjects relative to TPS peers — related
- Pennsylvania charter school students show similar reading growth but weaker math growth (about 30 fewer days of learning) than matched TPS peers — related
- Charter students in poverty show similar reading growth but significantly weaker math growth (about 18 fewer days) than their TPS peers in poverty — related
- Three of nine Washington charter schools showed significantly stronger academic progress than local district options in both reading and math — related
- Idaho charter school students show stronger reading growth than matched TPS peers, with no significant difference in math growth — related
- Much remains unknown about charter school performance, particularly at the elementary level — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pa-charter-impact-by-grade-configuration |
title |
Charter elementary schools show stronger reading growth while multi-level charter schools show significantly weaker growth in both subjects |
description |
Charter elementary schools show stronger reading growth while multi-level charter schools show significantly weaker growth in both subjects |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — center-for-research-on-education-outcomes-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.