Charter middle school students gain in math while multi-level charter students lag in both subjects relative to TPS peers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Charter middle school students show math growth equivalent to 53 additional days of learning versus TPS virtual twins, while multi-level charter students have 24 and 77 fewer days of learning in reading and math. → CREDO 2019
Evidence¶
CREDO 2019¶
CREDO, Center for Research on Education Outcomes, Stanford University. (2019). Charter School Performance in South Carolina. https://credo.stanford.edu/reports/item/charter-school-performance-in-south-carolina-2019-2/
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Grade-configuration analysis comparing charter students in elementary, middle, high, and multi-level schools with their respective VCRs; elementary and high charter students showed similar growth to TPS in both subjects.
"Inferior progress is found among charter students enrolled in multi-level schools. When compared to their TPS virtual twins multi-level charter students are found to have 24 and 77 fewer days of learning than TPS VCRs in reading and math, respectively."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Charter sector improvement stems mainly from existing schools improving, and gains appear at elementary, middle, and high school levels but not multi-level schools — related
- Middle-grade Idaho charter schools show the weakest growth while multi-level charters show the strongest reading growth — reports the opposite
- Charter elementary schools show stronger reading growth while multi-level charter schools show significantly weaker growth in both subjects — related
- Charter enrollment duration matters: first-year students lag in both subjects, while fourth-year students outperform in reading but still lag in math — related
- New Mexico charter elementary and middle school students show reading surpluses over TPS virtual twins, while high and multi-level charter students grow similarly — reports the opposite
- About 30 percent of South Carolina charter schools outperform traditional alternatives in reading and 15 percent in math, while 22 percent and 33 percent underperform — related
- Virtual charter schools show far lower achievement, with students losing the equivalent of half a year of learning in reading and a full year in mathematics — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sc-charter-grade-configuration-differences |
title |
Charter middle school students gain in math while multi-level charter students lag in both subjects relative to TPS peers |
description |
Charter middle school students gain in math while multi-level charter students lag in both subjects relative to TPS peers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — credo-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.