Claims

Explicit phonological awareness instruction significantly improved adult Saudi EFL learners' oral reading literacy from pretest to posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The treatment group's mean oral reading score rose significantly from pretest (M=4.33) to posttest (M=42.64) after 24 hours of phonological awareness instruction. → Ibrahim 2018

Evidence

Ibrahim 2018

Mahmoud Ibrahim. (2018). Explicit Versus Implicit Modes of EFL Reading Literacy Instruction: Using Phonological Awareness With Adult Arab Learners. English Language Teaching, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p144

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-sample t-test on the treatment group (n=36 completers) in a quasi-experimental study at the University College of Umluj; means rose from 4.33 (SD 3.59) to 42.64 (SD 17.06), t(35)=13.911, p=0.001, "in favor of the Posttest".

"Table 3 illustrates that t value was 13.9 with a significant p-value of 0.001 (which is less than 0.05). in other words, there is a significant difference between the mean score of the Posttest and the mean of the Pretest in favor of the Posttest."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.