Posttest scores of the phonological awareness treatment group were significantly higher than the control group's, with a large effect size¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The treatment group (M=42.64) significantly outscored the control group (M=6.39) on the posttest, t=11.920, p=0.001. → Ibrahim 2018
q2 i3 The between-group effect was large, with the article reporting an effect size of 0.872. → Ibrahim 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Ibrahim 2018¶
Mahmoud Ibrahim. (2018). Explicit Versus Implicit Modes of EFL Reading Literacy Instruction: Using Phonological Awareness With Adult Arab Learners. English Language Teaching, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p144
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Independent t-test comparing posttest means of treatment (n=36, M=42.64, SD 17.06) and control (n=31, M=6.39, SD 6.01) groups in the quasi-experiment; t=11.920, p=0.001, a statistically significant between-group difference.
"T-test scored 11.92 with a P-value of 0.001 (less than 0.05), as illustrated in Table 5. This clearly shows there is a statistically significant difference between both groups giving evidence that using phonological awareness has a significant effect on the sample's EFL literacy."
Ibrahim 2018 (2)¶
Mahmoud Ibrahim. (2018). Explicit Versus Implicit Modes of EFL Reading Literacy Instruction: Using Phonological Awareness With Adult Arab Learners. English Language Teaching, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p144
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
The article computed Cohen's d from the between-subject t value and degrees of freedom, reporting an effect size of 0.872, "which indicates a large effect size".
"The value of Cohen's d was 3.567 making an effect size of 0.872, which indicates a large effect size."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Explicit phonological awareness instruction significantly improved adult Saudi EFL learners' oral reading literacy from pretest to posttest — related
- An 11-week teacher-delivered phonological awareness intervention significantly improves kindergarten children's phoneme segmentation, letter knowledge, reading, and invented spelling — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.