Claims

Across 29 controlled studies, positive overall effects of school-based PA on mathematics performance appear in 45% of studies and neutral effects in 52%, with only one negative subgroup result

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of 29 studies involving 11,264 participants, 13 (45%) reported positive overall effects and 15 (52%) neutral effects on mathematics performance; only one study reported a significant negative result, for a subgroup in the first half of the intervention. → Sneck S. 2019

Evidence

Sneck S. 2019

Sneck S., Viholainen H., Syväoja H., Kankaapää A., Hakonen H., Poikkeus A.-M., Tammelin T. (2019). Effects of school-based physical activity on mathematics performance in children: a systematic review. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0866-6

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Systematic review of 29 controlled intervention studies (randomised trials and other pretest–posttest designs with control groups) in children aged 4–16. The review reports positive overall effects in "13 studies (45%)" and neutral in 15 (52%).

"Of the 29 studies involving 11,264 participants, positive overall effects of a PA intervention on mathematics performance were found in 13 studies (45%) and neutral overall effects in 15 studies (52%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.