Claims

Paired-course students achieved an 84% success rate in environmental science and an 84% fall-to-spring retention rate versus 73% for a similar-SAT comparison group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students in the study group had an 84% success rate (grade C or better) in the environmental science course. → Shaffer 2015 q2 i? Fall-to-spring retention was 84% for the study group versus 73% for a comparison group from the same entrance class with similar SAT profiles. → Shaffer 2015

Evidence

Shaffer 2015

Shaffer, S. C., Eshbach, B. E., & Santiago-Blay, J. A. (2015). A Dual Approach to Fostering Under-Prepared Student Success: Focusing on Doing and Becoming. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK5I_68g0X8

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics tracked exam and overall course grades and retention for the 15 paired-course students; retention was compared with same-year students of similar SAT profiles not in the paired model. No inferential test or effect size was printed for these rates.

"the retention rate from fall to spring was 84% for students in the study group as compared to 73% for a comparison group from the same entrance class with similar SAT prof iles, and (f) students in the study group had an 84% success rate (grade C or better) in the environmental science course"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.