Four specific sensorimotor connections showed significant TIME × GROUP interaction effects, with post-training increases only in the BCI-SRF group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? S1M1_R–Cere_R, THA_R–Cere_R, Cere_R–SMA_L, and S1M1_R–THA_L each showed significant TIME × GROUP interaction effects with post vs pre increases only in the BCI-SRF group. → Yuan Liu 2024
Evidence¶
Yuan Liu 2024¶
Yuan Liu, Shuaifei Huang, Weiguo Xu, Zhuang Wang & Dong Ming. (2024). An fMRI study on the generalization of motor learning after brain actuated supernumerary robot training. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00294-y
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA of each pairwise FC within the sensorimotor network at pre and post stages. Four connections showed significant TIME × GROUP interactions, and post-hoc tests showed "a significant post vs pre increase only for the BCI- SRF group" in S1M1_R–Cere_R (p = 0.03), THA_R–Cere_R (p = 0.004), and Cere_R–SMA_L (p = 0.012).
"A significant TIME × GROUP interaction effect was found between these 4 connections (S1M1_R with Cere_R: F (1, 17) = 4.527, p = 0.0483; THA_R with Cere_R: F (1, 17) = 4.817,p = 0.0424; Cere_R with SMA_L: F (1, 17) = 4.623, p = 0.0462; S1M1_R with THA_L F (1, 17) = 6.182, p = 0.0236)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- BCI-SRF training increased functional connectivity between the left primary sensorimotor cortex and left middle frontal gyrus, and between right-hemisphere intrahemispheric and interhemispheric sensorimotor regions, relative to finger training — related
- BCI-SRF training produces a substantially larger improvement in novel control-sequence accuracy than inborn finger training, with the BCI-SRF group's improvement 350% of the Finger group's — related
- BCI-SRF training increased causal effects along the SM_cortex–cerebellar–thalamus loop and enhanced bidirectional frontal-parietal causal interaction relative to finger training — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.