The parent intervention did not change students' perceptions of parents' STEM values at either follow-up¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students' perceptions of parents' STEM values did not differ between the treatment group and either control group at the six- or 12-month follow-up, contrary to H2. → Jiang Su 2026

Evidence¶

Jiang Su 2026¶

Jiang Su, Woodcock Anna, Haddad Kamel, Hernandez Paul R. (2026). Engaging Latinx or Hispanic-Identifying Families in Science Education: A Longitudinal Intervention Study. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0001047

q2 · i? · causal · r2

In the same propensity-weighted latent state treatment-effects models of the longitudinal quasi-experiment, the pre-registered hypothesis H2 about parent STEM value perceptions was not supported: state Parent STEM Values "did not differ across groups or time". No effect size or test statistic was printed for this contrast.

"Inconsistent with expectations, state Parent STEM Values did not differ across groups or time (H2 not supported)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A parent STEM workshop increased students' reported state-level parent-child STEM conversations at the six-month follow-up, with effects no longer present at 12 months — related
• The intervention group reported higher state parental support than the unreachable/non-interested control group at the 12-month follow-up — related