Parents' educational level shows no significant influence on pupils' metacognitive-ability test results¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Chi-square tests found no significant differences in metacognitive-ability test results by parents' educational level in any category relevant to the study. → Veselinov and Nikolic 2015
Evidence¶
Veselinov and Nikolic 2015¶
Danica Veselinov, Radmila Nikolić. (2015). THE POSSIBILITIES OF ENCOURAGING STUDENT'S METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES THROUGH HEURISTIC-METHODOLOGICAL INSTRUCTION. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.06
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Control-variable analysis conducted separately for control and experimental groups, comparing high school versus higher education categories; 4 subjects excluded for fathers' and 7 for mothers' education due to small cell sizes. No effect size printed.
"Chi-square test show ed that there were no significant differences in the results of the metacognitive ability test and the parents' educational level in any of the categories which were significant for ou r work."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Heuristic-methodological instruction shows no significant effect on pupils' reported learning planning — related
- Practice condition showed no significant association with self-reported financial behaviors about credit — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.