Claims

PBL-CBL produces significantly higher theoretical knowledge scores than LBL in orthopedic education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Students taught with PBL-CBL achieved significantly higher theoretical scores than those taught with LBL (SMD = 1.46). → Xiong Xianghua 2025

Evidence

Xiong Xianghua 2025

Xiong Xianghua, Xu Jiongnan, Luo Mingyan, Niu Dongsheng, Bi Qing, Wang Zhaofu, Zhang Jun. (2025). Efficacy of problem-based learning combined with case-based learning versus lecture-based learning in orthopedic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07741-3

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 14 studies (920 students) comparing PBL-CBL with LBL in orthopedic teaching. The pooled estimate favored PBL-CBL: "SMD = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.15–1.78, P < 0.0001". Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 77%).

"The PBL-CBL group demonstrated significantly higher theoretical scores than the LBL group (SMD = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.15–1.78, P < 0.0001, I2 = 77%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.