Claims

PBL produces higher examination scores than LBL in undergraduate pharmacology education (SMD = 2.03)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Undergraduate pharmacology students taught with PBL achieve higher examination scores than those taught with LBL (SMD = 2.03, 95% CI 1.53–2.53). → Yang X 2024

Evidence

Yang X 2024

Yang X, Yang Z, Ma S, Yan M, Yang Y. (2024). Evaluation of problem-based learning for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis in undergraduate students. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039376

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 30 comparative studies involving 4119 participants reporting examination scores, pooled with a random-effects model due to heterogeneity (I2 = 98%). The pooled effect size favored PBL: "SMD = 2.03, 95% CI [1.53, 2.53], P < .00001".

"Students receiving the PBL method in undergraduate pharmacology education tended to achieve higher examination scores in objective tests than those receiving the traditional LBL method (SMD = 2.03, 95% CI [1.53, 2.53], P < .00001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.