Among surveyed students, PBL students moderately out-performed non-PBL students on grade A achievement (chi-square p=0.065)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the surveyed sample, 16% of PBL students versus 8% of non-PBL students achieved grade A, a difference the authors call moderate (Pearson chi-square p=0.065). → Manaf et al. 2011
Evidence¶
Manaf et al. 2011¶
Nor Aziah Abdul Manaf, Zuaini Ishak & Wan Nordin Wan Hussin. (2011). Application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) in a Course on Financial Accounting Principles. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction: Vol. 8 (2011): 21-47. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1137300
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Chi-square analysis of the 264 surveyed students (Table 7, Panel A): Grade A 26 (0.16) PBL vs 8 (0.08) non-PBL; the table prints chi-square = 3.42 at p value = 0.065. The article describes the difference as moderate; no effect size is printed.
"PBL students moderately out-performed non-PBL students as indicated by the Pearson chi-square (p=0.07)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.