PBL students out-performed non-PBL students in final course grades in Financial Accounting Principles, with 14% versus 6% scoring A/A- and 3% versus 9% failing¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? PBL students out-performed non-PBL students across the grade distribution, including higher A/A- rates (14% vs 6%) and a lower failure rate (3% vs 9%). → Manaf et al. 2011
q2 i? The performance difference held for both final exam and coursework marks, not just coursework. → Manaf et al. 2011 (2)
Evidence¶
Manaf et al. 2011¶
Nor Aziah Abdul Manaf, Zuaini Ishak & Wan Nordin Wan Hussin. (2011). Application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) in a Course on Financial Accounting Principles. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction: Vol. 8 (2011): 21-47. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1137300
q2 · i? · design · r2
Observational comparison of all 1,148 students taking the course in First Semester 2006/2007 (PBL n=214, non-PBL n=934, Table 5). The article reports "About 14% of PBL students scored A and A-" versus 6% for non-PBL, and failure rates of about 3% versus 9%. No effect size or significance test is printed for this comparison.
"About 14% of PBL students scored A and A-, whereas for those students without PBL, only 6% of them scored an A or A-."
Manaf et al. 2011 (2)¶
Nor Aziah Abdul Manaf, Zuaini Ishak & Wan Nordin Wan Hussin. (2011). Application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) in a Course on Financial Accounting Principles. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction: Vol. 8 (2011): 21-47. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1137300
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Robustness test reported in the Results section to check the grade pattern was not driven by coursework marks alone; the article states PBL students scored higher on both components. No statistics are printed.
"The result showed that for both final exam and coursework, students from the PBL class scored higher marks than the non-PBL class."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Among surveyed students, PBL students moderately out-performed non-PBL students on grade A achievement (chi-square p=0.065) — related
- Students perceived PBL as providing significant benefits to presentation skills, teamwork, leadership and ability to use IT — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.