Claims

PBL is associated with higher overall DREEM medical educational environment scores than LBL in randomized trials

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pooled across six RCTs, PBL groups scored significantly higher than LBL groups on overall DREEM scores (WMD 9.10, 95% CI 5.98–12.21, p < 0.00001). → Qin Yongjie 2016

Evidence

Qin Yongjie 2016

Qin Yongjie, Wang Yungui, Floden Robert E. (2016). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Improvement of the Medical Educational Environment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medical Principles and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1159/000449036

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Random-effects meta-analysis of six RCTs (pooled n = 673; PBL 335, LBL 338), all conducted in China between 2006 and 2013, using Revman 5.3. The pooled weighted mean difference favored PBL: "WMD 9.10, 95% CI 5.98–12.21, p < 0.00001". Moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 61%, p < 0.10) was reported.

"Compared with the control LBL group, the pooled effect size showed a significant difference in medical educational environment scores (WMD 9.10, 95% CI 5.98–12.21, p < 0.00001) in favor of the PBL group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.