Claims

PBL students reported significantly higher satisfaction and interest in the course than LBL students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The PBL group had significantly higher satisfaction and interest levels in the course compared to the LBL group (both p < 0.001). → Chen Tu 2024

Evidence

Chen Tu 2024

Chen Tu, Zhao Yi-Jing, Huang Feng-Qing, Liu Qun, Li Ying, Alolga Raphael N., Zhang Lei, Ma Gaoxiang. (2024). The effect of problem-based learning on improving problem-solving, self-directed learning, and critical thinking ability for the pharmacy students: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314017

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Randomized controlled trial of 57 pharmacy students; Table 1 reports satisfaction (p = 0.0005) and interest (p = 0.001) distributions favoring PBL. The article reports "significantly higher satisfaction and interest levels" with no effect size.

"Results showed that the PBL group had significantly higher satisfaction and interest levels in the course compared to the LBL group (both p < 0.001, Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.