Claims

Students report higher satisfaction with PBL-CBL teaching than with LBL in orthopedic education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The PBL-CBL group showed higher satisfaction with the teaching methods than the LBL group (RR = 1.34); no standardized effect size was printed. → Xiong Xianghua 2025

Evidence

Xiong Xianghua 2025

Xiong Xianghua, Xu Jiongnan, Luo Mingyan, Niu Dongsheng, Bi Qing, Wang Zhaofu, Zhang Jun. (2025). Efficacy of problem-based learning combined with case-based learning versus lecture-based learning in orthopedic education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07741-3

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 7 studies (468 students) comparing satisfaction with teaching methods. Pooled risk ratio favored PBL-CBL: "RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.23–1.45, P < 0.0001" with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%); no standardized effect size was printed.

"The PBL-CBL group showed higher satisfaction with the teaching methods than the LBL group (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.23–1.45, P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.