Claims

Project-based activities significantly improve intermediate EFL students' reading comprehension compared with communicative language teaching instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? At α = .05, intermediate EFL learners taught through project-based activities (magazines or wall newspapers) scored significantly higher on a reading comprehension post-test than learners taught via CLT. → Mona Poorverdi Shiraz and Ebrahim Ezati Larsari 2014

Evidence

Mona Poorverdi Shiraz and Ebrahim Ezati Larsari 2014

Mona Poorverdi Shiraz and Ebrahim Ezati Larsari. (2014). The Effect of Project-Based Activities on Intermediate EFL Students' Reading Comprehension Ability. The Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol. 14, No.3, 38-54. https://uncw.edu/cte/et/

q2 · i? · causal · r2

One-way ANOVA on post-test scores of 120 intermediate female EFL students (40 per group) at Kish English Institute of Rasht, comparing two project-based groups with a CLT control group. The article reports F = 26.266, Sig. .000, and states there is "a significant positive relationship between using Project-based tasks and improving reading comprehension."

"The relatively high value of F = 26.266 showed that there is, indeed, a significant positive relationship between using Project-based tasks and improving reading comprehension."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.