Claims

Task-based reading instruction produces significantly higher reading post-test scores than traditional reading instruction for intermediate Iranian EFL learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Intermediate Iranian EFL learners taught reading through task-based activities scored significantly higher on a reading post-test than learners taught with traditional comprehension questions. → Mozhgan Madhkhan & Seyed Mojtaba Mousavi 2017

Evidence

Mozhgan Madhkhan & Seyed Mojtaba Mousavi 2017

Mozhgan Madhkhan & Seyed Mojtaba Mousavi. (2017). The Effect of Implimentation of TBLT in Reading Comprehension Classes of Iranian EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p119

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Controlled experiment: 70 learners randomly assigned to experimental (task-based) and control (traditional) groups, same texts, 20 sessions, reading post-test compared via t-test. The table reports t = 5.9, Sig. (2-tailed) = .000, mean difference 4.7000, showing "a statistically significant difference between the two groups". No effect size printed.

"T-test results make it clear that experimental group got higher mean scores than the control group, which indicates a statistically significant difference between the two groups. It implies that using TBLT is superior to the traditional method in reading classes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.