PBL+LBL significantly increases skill scores compared with LBL alone¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased skill scores by a mean of 2.11 compared with the LBL teaching model. → Jia Xue MM 2018

Evidence¶

Jia Xue MM 2018¶

Jia Xue MM, Zeng Wen MM, Zhang Qin MM, Tarantino. Giovanni. (2018). Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011366

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 13 RCTs reporting skill scores (651 and 649 students in the PBL+LBL and LBL groups, respectively), random effects model due to higher heterogeneity (P < .00001, I2 = 97%).

"The meta-analysis of the skill scores found that the PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased skill scores by a mean of 2.11 compared with the LBL teaching model (95% CI, 0.51–3.71; P = .01)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• PBL+LBL significantly increases medical writing scores compared with LBL alone
• PBL+LBL significantly increases comprehensive ability scores compared with LBL alone
• PBL+LBL significantly increases knowledge scores compared with LBL alone in Chinese medical education
• PBL significantly increases skill scores compared with LBL in Chinese pediatric medical education (SMD 1.56)
• Effects of PBL+LBL differ between practical and theoretical courses for some outcomes
• PBL significantly increases theoretical knowledge scores compared with LBL in Chinese pediatric medical education (SMD 1.16) — related