PBL+LBL significantly increases knowledge scores compared with LBL alone in Chinese medical education¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores by a mean of 4.32 compared with the LBL teaching model. → Jia Xue MM 2018
Evidence¶
Jia Xue MM 2018¶
Jia Xue MM, Zeng Wen MM, Zhang Qin MM, Tarantino. Giovanni. (2018). Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011366
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-analysis pooling all 23 included RCTs (1306 PBL+LBL vs 1283 LBL students) using a random effects model because of higher heterogeneity (P < .00001, I2 = 97%); the pooled mean difference favored "PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores".
"The meta-analysis of the knowledge scores found that the PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores by a mean of 4.32 compared with the LBL teaching model (95% CI, 2.85–5.78; P < .00001)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- PBL+LBL significantly increases medical writing scores compared with LBL alone
- PBL+LBL significantly increases skill scores compared with LBL alone
- Hybrid PBL+LBL pedagogy yields significantly better medical record writing assessment scores than LBL alone — related
- PBL+LBL significantly increases comprehensive ability scores compared with LBL alone — related
- Hybrid PBL+LBL pedagogy yields significantly better clinical theoretical knowledge assessment scores than LBL alone in Chinese medical students — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- PBL significantly increases skill scores compared with LBL in Chinese pediatric medical education (SMD 1.56) — related
- PBL significantly increases theoretical knowledge scores compared with LBL in Chinese pediatric medical education (SMD 1.16) — related
- PBL significantly increases case analysis scores compared with LBL in Chinese pediatric medical education (SMD 1.54) — related
- PBL significantly improves clinical skill scores compared with lecture-based learning in medical education — related
- TBL produces significantly higher theoretical test scores than PBL in medical education (SMD = 0.37) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.