PBL+LBL raises satisfactory teaching effect but not general or poor teaching effect ratings¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Satisfactory teaching effect rates were higher in the PBL+LBL group (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10–1.59; P = .003). → Jia Xue MM 2018
q3 i0 There was not a statistically significant difference in general teaching effect or poor teaching effect between the two groups. → Jia Xue MM 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Jia Xue MM 2018¶
Jia Xue MM, Zeng Wen MM, Zhang Qin MM, Tarantino. Giovanni. (2018). Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011366
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-analysis of 9 RCTs reporting satisfactory teaching effect (371 and 370 students in the PBL+LBL and LBL groups, respectively), random effects model due to higher heterogeneity (P = .0001, I2 = 75%).
"The meta-analysis of satisfactory teaching effect in the PBL+LBL teaching model found higher rates compared with the LBL teaching model (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10–1.59; P = .003)."
Jia Xue MM 2018 (2)¶
Jia Xue MM, Zeng Wen MM, Zhang Qin MM, Tarantino. Giovanni. (2018). Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011366
q3 · i0 · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs reporting general and poor teaching effect (251 and 251 students per group), fixed effects model because of lower heterogeneity (I2 = 38% and 12%). No statistically significant difference; equivalence was not tested.
"There was not a statistically significant difference in general teaching effect and poor teaching effect between the 2 groups (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55–1.08; P = .14; RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.23–1.51; P = .11; respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students rate teaching as satisfactory more often under PBL+LBL than LBL, with no significant differences for ordinary or poor ratings
- CBL increases teaching satisfaction versus LBL (RR=1.38) — related
- Students report higher satisfaction with PBL-CBL teaching than with LBL in orthopedic education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.