Claims

Post-test achievement and post-attitude did not differentiate by gender or pre-study mathematical attitude

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Tests of whether post-test scores differentiated by gender and pre-study attitude revealed no meaningfulness. → Özdemir et al. 2015

Evidence

Özdemir et al. 2015

Ahmet Şükrü Özdemir, Filiz Yıldız and Sevda Göktepe Yıldız. (2015). The effect of project based learning in “ratio, proportion and percentage” unit on mathematics success and attitude. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, No. 1. https://ojs.uef.fi/ejsme

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Secondary moderator analyses reported in the findings section: post-test scores were examined for differentiation by gender and by pre-study mathematical attitude, and neither test revealed meaningfulness. No statistics are printed for these tests.

"Finally, the tests which were used to find out whether control and experimental group students post-test scores differentiate according to their gender and their mathematical attitudes before the study or not, were not reveal any meaningfulness."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.