Claims

Project based learning produced higher post-test achievement than traditional teaching in the ratio, proportion and percentage unit

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental group students scored significantly higher on the post-test than control group students (p = 0.047). → Özdemir et al. 2015

Evidence

Özdemir et al. 2015

Ahmet Şükrü Özdemir, Filiz Yıldız and Sevda Göktepe Yıldız. (2015). The effect of project based learning in “ratio, proportion and percentage” unit on mathematics success and attitude. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, No. 1. https://ojs.uef.fi/ejsme

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre/post control-group study of 70 7th graders (36 experimental, 34 control) taught the same unit over 7 weeks. The unrelated t-test found a meaningful difference in favor of the experimental group, whose post-test mean was 16.47 versus 14.15 for the control group.

"According to the results of the unrelated t-test (Tab le 2), (p = 0,047 < 0,05) which was used to search whether there is a meaningful difference between th e post-test scores of control and experimental group students"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.